Not All Metrics Are Created Equal
VoIP monitoring dashboards can throw a lot of data at you—packet loss, jitter, MOS scores, latency, codec types, call durations, and more. But more data doesn’t always mean more insight. What matters is knowing which metrics actually reflect performance, user experience, and potential issues before they escalate.
The best dashboards give you a high-level view of call health, while allowing you to drill into specifics when things go sideways. But to get there, you need to know what you’re looking for—and why it matters.
1. Packet Loss
At the top of the list for good reason. Packet loss is a major contributor to poor audio quality, especially in real-time communications. A consistent packet loss rate—even if it seems small—can lead to robotic voices, missed words, or dropped calls.
This metric is particularly useful when paired with location data or endpoint-specific insights. Are calls from one branch office consistently showing 2–3% loss? That’s a red flag for local network or ISP issues.
Tracking average packet loss across all calls is helpful—but keep an eye out for spikes during specific timeframes or call types.
2. Jitter
Jitter measures the variation in packet arrival times. In other words, how consistently packets are delivered. Even if packets aren’t lost, large jitter values can cause delays and awkward silences that disrupt the flow of conversation.
VoIP relies on smooth, evenly spaced delivery of packets to maintain audio clarity. Anything above 30ms of jitter is usually noticeable to users.
Your dashboard should let you set jitter thresholds and alert you when they’re crossed. It’s also helpful to compare jitter values across endpoints or over time, especially in hybrid environments where Wi-Fi stability can vary wildly.
3. Latency (Round Trip Time)
Latency isn’t inherently bad—but too much of it, or inconsistent delays, can cause echo, overlapping speech, and user frustration. Anything under 150ms is generally acceptable for VoIP, though lower is always better.
Latency also helps diagnose where issues are coming from. If latency is high across all endpoints, it could be your SIP provider or network backbone. If it’s isolated, it might be the user’s connection.
Make sure your VoIP monitoring dashboard includes visual latency trends over time, broken down by call route or network segment.
4. MOS (Mean Opinion Score)
MOS is a standardized metric that assigns a 1–5 score to call quality—5 being excellent, 1 being unusable. While it’s based on complex algorithmic modeling, what you really need to know is: anything below 4 warrants a closer look.
MOS is valuable because it blends multiple metrics—packet loss, jitter, latency—into one digestible quality score. It gives you a single number to benchmark performance and track trends.
That said, use it as a starting point, not a diagnosis. If your average MOS drops, dig into the underlying metrics to find out why.
5. Call Failures and Drop Rates
Your system might be logging 10,000 calls a day—but how many of them actually complete successfully? Drop rates and failed call attempts provide a strong signal for user experience.
Frequent call drops could suggest network instability, firewall issues, or poor SIP trunking performance. Failed attempts might point to configuration errors, DNS problems, or overloaded gateways.
Your dashboard should break this down by cause code (where possible) and correlate with time, geography, and endpoint to identify patterns.
6. Call Setup Time
This is the time it takes from dialing to when the call actually begins ringing. It’s a metric that’s often overlooked, but delays in call setup can frustrate users—especially in fast-paced environments like support centers or sales teams.
High setup times could be due to misconfigured SBCs, DNS resolution issues, or problems in the SIP signaling flow.
By monitoring this metric over time, you can ensure the communication experience stays fast and responsive, not sluggish and laggy.
7. Bandwidth Utilization
Bandwidth may not seem like a VoIP-specific metric, but it directly impacts quality. Congestion at peak hours or on shared circuits can lead to performance degradation.
Monitoring usage alongside call metrics helps identify whether bandwidth limitations are contributing to packet loss or jitter. Some VoIP monitoring software tools even correlate bandwidth usage with call quality in real-time, giving you a clearer picture of what’s going on.
8. Codec Usage
Different codecs require different amounts of bandwidth and offer varying levels of compression and quality. Your dashboard should show which codecs are in use across different call scenarios.
If high-bandwidth codecs like G.711 are being used in bandwidth-limited environments, you’ll want to consider switching to G.729 or Opus where appropriate. Codec mismatches or transcoding can also introduce latency or quality loss.
Making Dashboards Work for You
A well-designed dashboard isn’t just about displaying data—it’s about telling a story. The story of what’s working, what’s not, and where you should focus your energy next.
Don’t overwhelm yourself (or your team) by tracking every single metric. Instead, build custom views that surface what matters most to your business: maybe it’s site-level call quality, maybe it’s agent-specific drop rates, or maybe it’s after-hours alerting.
The key is to align your monitoring with your operational goals. What do you actually need to know to ensure clear, reliable communication?
Final Thoughts
Tracking the right VoIP metrics isn’t just about keeping an eye on your network—it’s about protecting user experience, avoiding downtime, and solving small issues before they become major disruptions.
VoIP systems don’t always scream when something’s wrong. Sometimes, the signs are subtle—a slow dip in MOS, a spike in jitter during lunch hours, or a codec change you didn’t authorize. With the right dashboard, and the right data in front of you, those quiet signals become clear warnings—and, even better, opportunities to improve.
Because VoIP monitoring isn’t just a technical task—it’s a business-critical one.